🗺️ Overview

Use this self-assessment to identify where your team currently sits in terms of AI maturity - across both Tooling and Strategy. Each section includes examples, a 0–10 rating scale, reflection prompts, and next steps.

Tooling 🛠️

Strategy 🧠

Level Description
0 Has heard of ChatGPT or “AI” but hasn’t tried it
1 Has used ChatGPT, but mostly for fun or random prompts, maybe tried a couple of other models.
2 Uses ChatGPT for work (e.g. rewriting copy), but lacks structure or prompting technique.
3 Uses prompts with context (e.g. pasting in frameworks, job specs), experiments with Custom GPTs.
4 Starts connecting ChatGPT to workflows (e.g. summaries, interview prep), maybe pastes in spreadsheet data.
5 Building light automations (Zapier, Make, Notion buttons), testing agentic workflows for recurring processes.
6 Can design full end-to-end workflows using tools like Make.com or n8n, using logic, branching, JSON and webhooks.
7 Can debug automations, work with APIs, and create self-updating dashboards or Notion databases.
8 Uses advanced tools, embeds AI into websites/internal tools, understands use of vector DBs for RAG.
9 Creates lightweight internal agents for HR (e.g. career coach GPT, onboarding concierge), deploys with custom UIs.
10 Can code or fine-tune models, builds agentic systems from scratch (and maybe shouldn’t be in HR anymore 😅).
Level Description
0 Heard of AI, maybe used ChatGPT once or twice - no intent, no application.
1 Occasional use for generic HR tasks (e.g. “rewrite this policy”), but no consistency or value measurement.
2 Using AI for low-stakes time savers - job ads, email drafting, rewording documents. Still tactical and unstructured.
3 One or two workflows now reliably use AI (e.g. onboarding checklist or interview questions), but not widely adopted.
4 A few team members use AI consistently in core processes. Some internal sharing, but no enablement or strategic support.
5 AI use is encouraged. One or two champions have created playbooks, started evaluating tooling, and linking use to KPIs.
6 People team begins to intentionally build workflows and rituals powered by AI - feedback summaries, comms, planning.
7 AI is used by default in some key areas - e.g. performance, onboarding, internal comms. Team trained and supported.
8 AI informs or transforms strategic People work - e.g. performance redesign, workforce planning, L&D personalisation.
9 AI-enabled People workflows actively influence other departments - e.g. sales onboarding, talent insights for finance.
10 AI isn’t an add-on - it is how the People team delivers. End-to-end workflows are automated or agentic by design.

👉 Your Team’s Score (0–10):

<aside> 💪

What’s your score here:

</aside>

💭 Reflection Questions:

👉 Your Team’s Score (0–10):

<aside> 💪

What’s your score here:

</aside>

💭 Reflection Questions:


🧭 AI Maturity 9-Box Grid for People Teams

🎯 How to Use It

Low Tooling (0–3) Medium Tooling (4–6) High Tooling (7–10)
High Strategy (7–10) 🚧 Visionary (Blocked)  Big ideas, no systems. Team sees AI’s potential but lacks build capability. 🧩 Enabler Clear strategic use cases with growing tools and workflows. Outcomes visible, scalable next. 🚀 Transformer People strategy is AI-powered. Systems, workflows, and agents deliver strategic outcomes.
Medium Strategy (4–6) 🪞 Frustrated Experimenter Some intent, but value unclear. Isolated wins, no playbook. 🔁 Workflow Builder Using AI in real HR processes. Starting to measure and improve impact. 🧰 Operational Architect AI is embedded in rituals, dashboards, feedback. Team works like a product function.
Low Strategy (0–3) 🧃 Toytown Playing with ChatGPT, no repeatable value. Feels fun, not useful. 🛠️ Tinkerer Automations and prompts are everywhere, but disconnected from team goals. 🧱 Overtooled & Underaligned Building advanced tools with no strategic anchor. Risk of burnout and waste.

🛠️ Next Steps Builder

🧩 Our Maturity Strengths

[ Add a checklist or bullet list of what you’re already doing well ]